Last week Health Service Journal announced that unsafe hospital trusts are to be ‘named and shamed’ online if they do not comply with patient safety alerts. But is this really the best approach to take in improving patient safety?

Patient safety alerts are issued when potentially harmful situations are identified in healthcare organisations.  Alerts are an important part of the work that NHS England undertake in warning the healthcare system of risks and providing guidance to avoid potential incidents that may lead to serious harm or death. But will publicising such alerts just contribute to the negative view of our healthcare system that many already have.

With numerous government reports and high profile figures, including the health secretary Jeremy Hunt, blaming a lack of compassion from staff as the cause of many patient safety failures, it seems that constant negative publicity has resulted in staff and trusts being caught in a vicious circle – negativity breeding more negativity. It is often easy to forget that despite all of the negative publicity towards NHS trusts, the majority of healthcare staff will continue to provide excellent patient care.

Related post

How Alcidion found its market in the UK for a new kind of health tech

Smart health tech provider Alcidion is seeing rapid growth in the UK following the formal launch of its flagship platform, Miya Precision. That’s in part due to a bold communications campaign says Lynette Ousby, Alcidion’s…

Continue reading

This week marks a year since the publication of the Francis report, which examined the causes of the failings in care at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust between 2005 and 2009. Among the key areas highlighted were the importance of openness, transparency and candour as well as improved support for compassionate, caring and committed care. The report sought to prioritise what practices needed urgent revision within the NHS as a whole. Whilst it may be perceived that the report led to unfair criticism of the nursing profession who were already struggling due to levels of staffing and underfunding, the real aim was to drive significant improvements in patient safety and care.

In the government’s response to the Francis report, measures were outlined calling for trusts to regularly publish details of staffing levels and encouraged the implementation of ideas like hourly ward rounds and supervisory status for ward managers.

Nursing Times recently carried out a survey to gather insight into the impact that the Francis report has had. The survey revealed that the current staffing on wards varies for nurses, with 39% of those asked warning that staffing levels have worsened at their place of work over the last 12 months. This truly highlights that it is unlikely to be lack of compassion that leads to failures in patient safety, but a lack of time.

Of the respondents to the survey, almost half believe that the Francis report will bring “long-term positive change for the quality of healthcare provision in the NHS”. Despite the negativity surrounding trusts such as Mid Staffs, there is no strong evidence that the standard of care in the NHS is deteriorating. However, the media focus continues to be negative.

Related post

Digital plans for end of life and urgent care: How NHS Coordinate My Care reached out to the public

London’s Coordinate My Care service sought to launch a new online care plan to the public to empower people with long term conditions, and people at the end of their lives, to share their wishes about the care they want to receive. Working in…

Continue reading

Patients have the right to know about the standard of care that they will receive at their local hospital. This information allows them to make more informed decisions about where, when and who will be in charge of their care. The NHS is already addressing patient choice and transparency with schemes such as Choose and Book but is this enough and what more can be done? Blaming staff and publically discrediting hospital trusts will not improve care in the long term. Staff need to feel supported in their role and be assured that changes are being made at a local and national level which will help them improve the care of their patients.

With this new approach, we will no doubt end up publicly naming underfunded and understaffed providers who are trying desperately to function while striving for quality and safety at the same time as trying to balance the books. With the support of government funding, hospital trusts are continuing to improve in all aspects of patient care and safety. Perhaps the press need to focus on all of the improvements, which will lead to trusts aspiring to achieve more? Shaming trusts further will only light the fire of more negative media coverage.

Related post

How one medical imaging company projected its message to the NHS

Sectra’s approach to marketing has been less about selling, and more about promoting ideas. Jane Rendall, Chris Scarisbrick and Caroline Marjason explain how driving change through discussion and debate, with the support of Highland Marketing…

Continue reading

Want more articles like this one?

Our free newsletter drops into your inbox every Friday to bring you...
  • Industry news
  • Essential analysis
  • Unmissable interviews
  • HM blog posts, tips and advice

Sign up:

Highland Marketing Ltd will use the information you provide on this form to send you our newsletter. Additionally, please let us know if you would like to hear from us about:

Read more information about our privacy practices. By clicking to subscribe below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

Find out how we can help your business

Get in touch

top