I’m not a big user of Skype. I have an account, I set up a username a few years ago and I can count the number of times I have used it on one hand. Despite falling into the demographic of a typical Skype user – (between the ages of 18-35 and ‘socially engaged’), I do not find myself using it as a main communication tool. Phone calls, text messages, emails still seem to be the norm for me. But I can see how Skype is more appropriate for certain types of communication where a real time visual is a requirement.

Following David Cameron’s speech at the Conservative Party Conference, I found myself questioning Skype’s potential in improving patient experience and clinical outcomes. As part of a promise for seven-day GP access, the Prime Minister announced an extension to the ‘Challenge Fund’, a £50m pilot scheme, which includes offering Skype consultations to patients.

Related post

How Alcidion found its market in the UK for a new kind of health tech

Smart health tech provider Alcidion is seeing rapid growth in the UK following the formal launch of its flagship platform, Miya Precision. That’s in part due to a bold communications campaign says Lynette Ousby, Alcidion’s…

Continue reading

And David Cameron is not the only politician who believes that Skype consultations could have real merit in healthcare. Earlier this year, health secretary Jeremy Hunt announced that his “pet idea” was for GPs to be able to Skype hospital consultants before a referral, to check that the referral is appropriate, and to learn more about the condition.

Reflecting back to some follow-up GP appointments after my knee operation, I find it hard to imagine these being delivered via Skype. Firstly, there was clearly a physical requirement to check the progress of my knee’s movement and strength, plus I live very close to my local practice. I also think that there is an element of reassurance by seeing your GP face-to-face, that you have been comprehensively diagnosed or ‘checked-up’. I can imagine that had this appointment been via Skype, I would have ended up going to the doctor anyway – just to make sure.

But maybe I am not your typical candidate for Skype consultations. I would suggest clinicians should be very selective on who would qualify. Those with long-term health conditions who require regular check-ups, or those that live in remote areas are stronger candidates for the service.  But at the same time they of course, should not be discriminated against and instead offered Skype on the understanding that this is one of many options available to them.

Although it might be slow progress, demand is growing as technologies like Skype become more popular and mainstream. At the recent Healthcare Efficiency Through Technology Expo in London, Michael Seres, a long term condition patient who had a bowel transplant, talked about how he asked his transplant team if he could communicate via Skype, rather than travelling an hour an a half to the hospital. Unfortunately all bar one of the consultants and administrative staff refused to be part of the Skype call, which resulted in the clinician Skyping him from his home!

Related post

Digital plans for end of life and urgent care: How NHS Coordinate My Care reached out to the public

London’s Coordinate My Care service sought to launch a new online care plan to the public to empower people with long term conditions, and people at the end of their lives, to share their wishes about the care they want to receive. Working in…

Continue reading

Whilst there has been some progression of the use of Skype and other VOIP (voice over internet protocol) technologies, categorised by the term ‘telehealth’, it has generally been met with mixed reactions from patients and clinicians for many years now. Questions have been raised to whether the technology can really save time for busy GPs and if telehealth is in fact a viable care model.

At the moment it seems that there are more risks than rewards to using technologies like Skype in GP practices. There are cases where Skype can offer more convenient access for patients, potentially reduce waiting times and provide a useful tool for initial consultations.

On the flip side, how do GPs account for technology failures such as a broadband outage? Are there sufficient audit trails with videoconferencing? How are videos saved and protected? If a GP misses a vital symptom, who is liable? The people who may value this service the most, such as the elderly and infirm, may not have access or the technology skills to use such software.

As technology adoption develops, inevitably we will reach a time when using Skype in healthcare will become the norm. The extension to the ‘Challenge Fund’ outlined by David Cameron will help chosen ‘pioneer’ practices address unanswered questions and teething problems as the demand and expectation from patients rises in a time when getting an appointment with your GP is neither timely or convenient.

Related post

How one medical imaging company projected its message to the NHS

Sectra’s approach to marketing has been less about selling, and more about promoting ideas. Jane Rendall, Chris Scarisbrick and Caroline Marjason explain how driving change through discussion and debate, with the support of Highland Marketing…

Continue reading

Want more articles like this one?

Our free newsletter drops into your inbox every Friday to bring you...
  • Industry news
  • Essential analysis
  • Unmissable interviews
  • HM blog posts, tips and advice

Sign up:

Highland Marketing Ltd will use the information you provide on this form to send you our newsletter. Additionally, please let us know if you would like to hear from us about:

Read more information about our privacy practices. By clicking to subscribe below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

Find out how we can help your business

Get in touch